Home / Quality & Compliance / Reconsideration of value

Guide

Reconsideration of value: what it is and what it isn't.

When a question comes up about the facts or analysis in an appraisal, a reconsideration of value can help. A reconsideration of value (ROV) asks the appraiser to look again at the analysis in light of specific information. It isn't an appeal for a higher number, and it doesn't guarantee a change — but when there's real evidence, it gets a real read.

Updated · Reviewed by Avisso Appraisal Management

Common reasons for a reconsideration request

A reconsideration request is a way to raise a specific question about the facts, the comparable sales or the analysis in a report, with supporting information. A request can address:

  1. Factual errors or omissions — incorrect square footage, room count, lot size, condition, upgrades or property characteristics.
  2. Inadequate comparable data — relevant sales the appraiser did not consider, or comparables that do not reflect the subject's market.
  3. Concerns about bias or discrimination — any indication the value was influenced by a prohibited basis. These are reviewed under a separate process and may be reported to the appropriate authorities.

What doesn't qualify on its own: a different opinion about what the house is worth. Without new information, there's nothing for the appraiser to reconsider.

What to send with it

Evidence is what moves a reconsideration. The more specific the request, the more useful the response. Helpful documentation includes:

  • Permits, plans, listing details or photographs that establish the fact in question
  • A short statement of what is believed to be in error and why
  • Alternative comparable sales with MLS or public-record source

Comparable-sale guidelines

Requests often include alternative comparable sales. They carry weight when they're genuinely comparable — same market, similar house, recent. As a working guide:

Comparable-sale guidelines for ROV submissions
CriterionWorking guideline
Sale dateRecent closed sale near the effective date
LocationSame market area or competing neighbourhood
Size and styleSimilar living area, lot, age and design
VerificationMLS number or public-record source provided
NumberFollow the lender's submission requirements for alternative sales

Thresholds are illustrative of typical practice.

What happens after you submit

  1. 01

    Request

    Lender submits with documentation.

    Lender
  2. 02

    Screen

    Checked for completeness and appropriateness.

  3. 03

    Route

    Sent to the appraiser; independence protected.

  4. 04

    Respond

    Appraiser addresses each point in writing.

    Appraiser
  5. 05

    Review and deliver

    Outcome reviewed and returned to the lender.

The lender's role

Receives the borrower's request, screens it for specificity, and submits it through Avisso. The lender does not contact the appraiser directly about value.

The appraiser's role

Reviews the information, responds to each point, and revises the report only where the analysis supports it. The appraiser remains responsible for the professional opinion.

Avisso's role

Checks the request is complete and appropriate, routes it while protecting independence, tracks the response, and reviews the outcome.

What an ROV can't do

It can't guarantee a change in value, a faster closing, or a second appraisal. If the appraiser's analysis holds up after a fair look at the new information, the original conclusion stands — and that's the process working, not failing. A lender can separately decide whether a review or second appraisal is warranted.

Questions

Have an ROV on an active order?

Submit it through the client portal or your assigned contact, with the documentation above. If you're not sure whether it qualifies, ask — that's a reasonable call to make. [INTEGRATION TO CONFIRM]